Judge Halts Removal of Robert E. Lee Statue Over 130-Year-Old Deed
Imagine wanting to keep a racist statue. Information technology's very rocky for most families to reckon this, just at least one family is hard to do it. Here's what's going away connected.
A Virginia judge has temporarily saved the statue of Robert E. Lee on Capital of Virginia's Monument Avenue, sparing information technology the fate of monuments to historic racists in Philadelphia, Brighton, Antwerp, Boston, and other cities around the world As protests against grouping unfairness and police violence continue.
The ten-day cease and desist order was issued in response to a lawsuit from William C. Gregory, who claims to be a descendant of two signatories to the March 1890 deed that transferred possession of the site to the body politic. Under the damage of that lot, Virginia agreed to "faithfully guard" and "affectionately protect" both the 21-foot monument and 40-foot pedestal. Gregory says that removing them would be an abdication of this responsibleness.
The judge isn't saying that Gregory's literary argument is correct; he's saying that it's in the best interest of the public for the argument to constitute solved before Virginia Governor Ralph Northam's regularize to remove the statue is carried out.
"(Gregory's) family has taken pridefulness for 130 geezerhood in that statue resting upon land belonging to his family and transferred to the Commonwealth in circumstance of the Commonwealth contractually guaranteeing to constantly treasure and protect the Lee Memorial," the lawsuit says.
There are two possibilities here, neither of which makes a very disillusioning case that the statue should stay.
Prototypical, in that location's the possibility that a 130-year-old land cover is actually an enduring rootage of pride for the Gregory family, which is rattling weird and non a reputable way to decide how to use a piece of publicly owned prop. If this is the case, atomic number 2 mustiness know and simply disregard the like pain the descendants of the people Lee fought to keep subjugated feel.
Irregular, Gregory is a white supremacist who is using this relatively palatable rationale to preserve a memorial to white supremacy without coming out and saying that's what he's doing. This would survive quite easy to moving ridge aside his opinion happening the statue because naturally a racist is going to like a prejudiced statue.
Either direction, information technology's apparently that Gregory doesn't deserve more of a say in what happens to the Lee statue than whatever other Old Dominion citizen. Here's hoping that a court ultimately finds that to be the case and that another statue of a white supremacist can be toppled, albeit many geezerhood (and in that slip, ten extra days) too late.
https://www.fatherly.com/news/robert-e-lee-statue-richmond-removal-injunction-deed/
Source: https://www.fatherly.com/news/robert-e-lee-statue-richmond-removal-injunction-deed/
0 Response to "Judge Halts Removal of Robert E. Lee Statue Over 130-Year-Old Deed"
Post a Comment